Ute vs Kiowa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Kiowa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ute
Kiowa
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Kiowa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,289 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 44.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Kiowa |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 24.2% |
| Range | 24.8% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 12.0% |
| Median | 6.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |