Zimbabwean vs Kiowa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Kiowa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Kiowa
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Kiowa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,289 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 59.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Kiowa |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 17.3% | 24.2% |
| Range | 16.5% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 12.0% |
| Median | 5.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |