Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Singapore Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Singapore
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Singapore
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Singapore Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,492,636 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 7.8%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Singapore |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.042% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 17.6% |
Range | 16.5% | 17.5% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.2% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Singapore by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 0.68%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |