Ghanaian vs Potawatomi Family Households
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Potawatomi
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ghanaians
Potawatomi
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Potawatomi Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,523,422 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,902 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 50.2% | 37.1% |
Maximum | 95.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.4% | 62.9% |
Mean | 68.3% | 66.1% |
Median | 67.1% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Potawatomi by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Japan (63.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |