Greek vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from Oceania
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,359,857 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 16.7% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
| Range | 83.3% | 82.6% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 64.5% |
| Median | 67.9% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.5% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.5% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.4% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |