White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Immigrants from Oceania
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,404,085 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041 and weighted average of 65.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 57.8% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 73.9% | 91.4% |
Range | 16.1% | 82.6% |
Mean | 65.4% | 64.5% |
Median | 65.4% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 62.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.9% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.0%), English (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |