Immigrants from Canada vs Ute Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Ute
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Ute
30.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Ute Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,760,568 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 30.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%, a difference of 8.4%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Ute |
Minimum | 23.8% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 76.2% | 87.5% |
Mean | 54.1% | 57.2% |
Median | 36.9% | 47.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.8% | 29.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.4% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.7% | 70.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.9% | 33.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.3% | 32.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Puget Sound Salish (30.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (30.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (30.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Pakistani (30.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Scotland (30.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |