Indian (Asian) vs Ute Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Ute
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Ute
25.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Ute Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,301,361 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%, a difference of 30.6%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Ute |
Minimum | 1.6% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.7% | 87.5% |
Mean | 20.7% | 57.2% |
Median | 20.7% | 47.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 29.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 70.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 33.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 32.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Iranian (25.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (25.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (25.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (25.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and Immigrants from Singapore (25.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 23.6% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 24.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.0% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Armenians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |