Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Immigrants from Oceania
43.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,963,461 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 43.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 6.9%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 16.3% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 66.4% | 91.9% |
| Range | 50.1% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 44.1% | 44.8% |
| Median | 44.6% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.4% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.9% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Salvadoran (43.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (43.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American Indian (43.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eritrea (43.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Indonesian (43.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |