Bhutanese vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Bhutanese
Chickasaw
$49,894
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,599,247 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of $49,894. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 36.8%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $8,097 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $91,569 | $42,047 |
| Range | $83,472 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $45,753 | $28,009 |
| Median | $44,077 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $37,217 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $53,334 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $16,117 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $13,593 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $13,533 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland ($49,893, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean ($49,862, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($49,983, a difference of 0.18%), South African ($50,044, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Asia ($49,741, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional $50,417 |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional $50,385 |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional $50,303 |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional $50,065 |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional $50,057 |
| South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional $49,526 |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional $49,482 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |