Bhutanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,277,272 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $82,193, a difference of 43.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $70,005, a difference of 43.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $77,929, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $34,414, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $44,763, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 61.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.8%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.0%).