Chickasaw vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 16-19

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chickasaw Latvians

COMPARE

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Latvian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean LaotianLatvianLebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 16-19

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison

Chickasaw

Latvians

Exceptional

38.3%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19

97.8/ 100

METRIC RATING

117th/ 347

METRIC RANK

38.9%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19

99.4/ 100

METRIC RATING

96th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chickasaw vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,579,210 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,454,154 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 38.9%, a difference of 1.5%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Latvian
Minimum	7.1%	8.4%
Maximum	71.4%	100.0%
Range	64.3%	91.6%
Mean	36.5%	50.8%
Median	37.5%	41.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	29.4%	37.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	42.8%	59.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.5%	21.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.1%	23.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.0%	23.6%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (38.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Ukrainian (38.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Maltese	98.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 38.5%
Crow	98.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 38.5%
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 38.3%
Ukrainians	97.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 38.3%
Ethiopians	97.4 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 38.2%
Guamanians/Chamorros	97.4 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 38.2%
Seminole	96.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| England	96.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 38.1%

Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from North America (38.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (38.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (38.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Canada (38.9%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Alaska Natives	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 39.0%
Spanish Americans	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 39.0%
Osage	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 39.0%
Blackfeet	99.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North America	99.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 38.9%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 38.9%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 38.9%
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%