Chickasaw vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 30-34

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chickasaw Latvians

COMPARE

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Latvian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean LaotianLatvianLebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age 30-34

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison

Chickasaw

Latvians

Tragic

Exceptional

81.9%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34

0.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

311th/ 347

METRIC RANK

86.0%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

16th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chickasaw vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,645,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Latvian
Minimum	54.6%	58.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	45.4%	41.6%
Mean	80.6%	90.0%
Median	79.6%	89.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	73.8%	85.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	85.2%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.4%	14.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.5%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.4%	9.1%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 82.3%
Osage	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 82.3%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 82.2%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 82.2%
Puget Sound Salish	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 82.0%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 82.0%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 81.9%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 81.9%
Iroquois	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 81.9%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 81.7%
Cherokee	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 81.6%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 81.5%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 81.5%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 81.4%

Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Cameroon (86.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (86.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 86.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 86.2%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 86.2%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 86.1%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 86.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 86.0%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 86.0%
Sierra Leoneans	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 86.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 86.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 86.0%
Bermudans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.9%
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.9%