Czech vs Belizean In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Czech
Belizean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Czechs
Belizeans
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Belizean In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,823,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 65.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,214,233 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.88%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Belizean |
| Minimum | 34.2% | 34.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 90.0% |
| Range | 65.8% | 55.3% |
| Mean | 64.4% | 62.3% |
| Median | 64.6% | 64.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 59.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Czechs by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
| Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
| Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
| Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
| Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
| Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
| Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
| Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
| Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |