Filipino vs Belizean In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Filipino
Belizean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Filipinos
Belizeans
65.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Belizean In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,350,604 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,214,233 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Belizean |
Minimum | 38.4% | 34.7% |
Maximum | 73.7% | 90.0% |
Range | 35.3% | 55.3% |
Mean | 62.6% | 62.3% |
Median | 63.7% | 64.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.6% | 59.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 66.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Bangladeshi (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uruguay (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Australia (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Iranians | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Aleuts | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Okinawans | 98.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Uruguayans | 98.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Denmark (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Fijian (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |