Latvian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Latvian
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Latvians
Chinese
38.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,454,154 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 38.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 0.72%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Chinese |
Minimum | 8.4% | 12.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.9% |
Range | 91.6% | 63.1% |
Mean | 50.8% | 40.5% |
Median | 41.8% | 39.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.8% | 35.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.2% | 42.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from North America (38.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (38.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (38.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Canada (38.9%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Spanish Americans | 99.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 39.0% |
Osage | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 39.0% |
Blackfeet | 99.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Latvians | 99.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Ugandans | 99.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |