Pima vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,494,097 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 34.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 13.2%.

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Russia (34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American Indian (34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (34.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (34.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Peru (34.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%).