Ute vs South African In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
South African
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Ute
South Africans
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
88.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs South African In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,179 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | South African |
| Minimum | 16.2% | 74.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.8% | 25.1% |
| Mean | 79.2% | 89.2% |
| Median | 81.7% | 86.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 84.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 97.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Chilean (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belarus (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Finnish (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 88.8 /100 | #116 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Finns | 87.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Filipinos | 87.1 /100 | #119 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 86.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 85.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Scandinavians | 85.1 /100 | #122 | Excellent 84.9% |