Ute vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Ute
South African
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Ute
South Africans
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs South African In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,546,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | South African |
| Minimum | 23.7% | 73.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.3% | 26.4% |
| Mean | 73.4% | 86.0% |
| Median | 75.4% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 90.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.3% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |