Bahamian vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
Malaysian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
Malaysians
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,412,919 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 17.9% |
| Range | 41.8% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
| Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |