Lebanese vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
Malaysian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Malaysians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,468,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.77%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lebanese | Malaysian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 48.5% | 17.9% |
Range | 47.0% | 16.4% |
Mean | 11.6% | 6.9% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 9.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Malaysians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Liberian (5.4%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |