Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Haiti Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Haiti
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Haiti
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Haiti Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,156,546 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 0.83%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Haiti |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 35.8% |
| Range | 29.0% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 16.8% |
| Median | 15.6% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Haiti by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Haiti are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |