Bangladeshi vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Turks
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 34.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 29.0% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 10.0% |
| Median | 15.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |