Belgian vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Belgian
Czechoslovakian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Belgians
Czechoslovakians
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,775,724 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belgian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 32.3% |
| Range | 23.0% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.0% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.21%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |