Immigrants from Indonesia vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Czechoslovakian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Czechoslovakians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,706,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 45.9% | 32.3% |
| Range | 45.2% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.7% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |