Bhutanese vs Chinese Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chinese
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Chinese
25.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Chinese Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,258,638 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,411,570 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 24.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 73.4% | 63.6% |
| Range | 70.8% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 24.4% | 24.6% |
| Median | 23.4% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Chinese by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Iranian (25.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Indian (Asian) (25.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (25.8%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Ireland (25.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and Bolivian (25.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (24.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (24.4%, a difference of 1.0%), Filipino (24.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Iran (25.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 23.9% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 24.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 24.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.6% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 25.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |