Blackfeet vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Whites/Caucasians
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,450,114 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 22.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 72.4% | 33.9% |
| Range | 69.4% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 24.1% | 16.7% |
| Median | 19.0% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.4% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |