Immigrants from Bulgaria vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bulgaria
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Whites/Caucasians
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bulgaria vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,523,298 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 11.5%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bulgaria | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 3.1% | 10.3% |
Maximum | 76.0% | 33.9% |
Range | 72.9% | 23.6% |
Mean | 12.9% | 16.7% |
Median | 7.4% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |