British West Indian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
✖
White/Caucasian
✖
Single Female Poverty
✖
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Whites/Caucasians
22.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,955,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 0.59%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 61.7% | 38.3% |
Range | 60.3% | 20.0% |
Mean | 22.6% | 24.3% |
Median | 21.9% | 24.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.0% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |