Potawatomi vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Whites/Caucasians
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,128,291 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 11.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 18.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 38.3% |
| Range | 90.9% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 42.8% | 24.3% |
| Median | 35.3% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.3% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 26.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |