Celtic vs Hawaiian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Hawaiian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Hawaiians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
39.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,347,433 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 0.98%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Hawaiian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 47.5% |
Range | 97.8% | 42.5% |
Mean | 15.9% | 14.3% |
Median | 12.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Hawaiians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Uruguayan (13.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Portugal (13.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |