Celtic vs Hawaiian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Hawaiian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Hawaiians
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Hawaiian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,605,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Hawaiian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.3% |
Range | 98.7% | 26.0% |
Mean | 8.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |