Chickasaw vs Jamaican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jamaican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Jamaicans
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 29.8% |
| Range | 36.7% | 24.5% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 15.4% |
| Median | 17.3% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Jamaicans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |