Chickasaw vs Ottawa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ottawa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Ottawa
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ottawa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,943,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Ottawa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 31.7% |
Range | 36.7% | 27.1% |
Mean | 18.1% | 15.0% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ottawa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |