Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Native/Alaskan
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Natives/Alaskans
34.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,526,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 34.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,815,701 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 36.6%, a difference of 6.4%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 21.2% | 9.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.4% |
Range | 78.7% | 75.6% |
Mean | 47.2% | 45.6% |
Median | 39.6% | 44.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.3% | 37.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 52.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Natives/Alaskans by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (36.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (36.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Yakama (36.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |