Creek vs Dominican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Dominican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Dominicans
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Dominican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,852,578 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 25.4%, a difference of 8.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Dominican |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 78.2% |
| Range | 68.3% | 67.9% |
| Mean | 35.3% | 29.2% |
| Median | 34.4% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.7% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.3% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.6% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Dominicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |