South African vs Dominican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Dominican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Dominicans
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Dominican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,852,578 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 25.4%, a difference of 24.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Dominican |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 78.2% |
| Range | 92.6% | 67.9% |
| Mean | 23.5% | 29.2% |
| Median | 20.4% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 10.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |