Cuban vs Potawatomi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Potawatomi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Potawatomi
12.4%
MALE POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Potawatomi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,765,698 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,745,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 0.97% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 59.6% |
Range | 22.4% | 55.1% |
Mean | 12.5% | 18.0% |
Median | 12.2% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Potawatomi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 0.98%), Salvadoran (12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Nicaraguan (12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Fijian (12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Armenia (12.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |