Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Africa
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,102,842 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 18.2%, a difference of 17.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 3.3% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 57.5% | 73.5% |
Range | 54.2% | 66.0% |
Mean | 21.9% | 22.7% |
Median | 17.6% | 19.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 24.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 11.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (18.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (18.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |