Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from China
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from China
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,951,403 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 19.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 5.9% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 63.8% | 33.3% |
Range | 57.9% | 25.9% |
Mean | 23.1% | 16.3% |
Median | 20.4% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (21.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |