Jordanian vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Jordanian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	1.0%	7.4%
Maximum	34.8%	33.3%
Range	33.7%	25.9%
Mean	17.3%	16.3%
Median	17.8%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.7%	13.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.5%	18.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.8%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.8%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.7%	4.5%

Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 18.6%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 18.7%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 18.7%
Tongans	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 18.8%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 18.8%
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 18.8%
Jordanians	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.9%
Macedonians	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.9%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 19.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 18.3%
Maltese	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 18.3%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 18.3%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 18.3%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 18.3%