Guatemalan vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Iroquois
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Guatemalans
Iroquois
21.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,016,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,253,116 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.543 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 4.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.1% | 6.4% |
Maximum | 73.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 72.1% | 93.6% |
Mean | 31.3% | 36.4% |
Median | 27.6% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.9% | 41.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.3% | 28.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 28.3% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.62%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Somali (21.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Blackfeet (20.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Haitian (20.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (20.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |