Guyanese vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Guyanese
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Guyanese
Creek
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,189,173 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 12.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Creek |
Minimum | 1.7% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 77.8% |
Range | 33.1% | 72.7% |
Mean | 18.0% | 31.3% |
Median | 17.2% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |