Immigrants vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants
Creek
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants
Creek
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 23.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Creek |
Minimum | 7.6% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 77.8% |
Range | 31.6% | 72.7% |
Mean | 17.8% | 31.3% |
Median | 17.4% | 28.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 40.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Panamanian (17.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |