Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Single Male Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,372,420 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 11.1%.

In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).