Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Chinese
10.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,171,646 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.76%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 57.9% |
| Range | 56.7% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 11.9% |
| Median | 10.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |