Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Chickasaw
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
20.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,106,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 25.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.77% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 38.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 37.2% | 63.9% |
Mean | 13.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 12.2% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Estonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Polish (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Slovene (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |