African vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
African
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Africans
Chickasaw
14.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 417,076,777 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 10.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 98.9% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 25.6% |
| Median | 19.1% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.5% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.6% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Africans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Scotch-Irish (14.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (14.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Ottawa (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), French Canadian (14.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and Nonimmigrants (14.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |