Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Chippewa
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,978,611 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 34.1% |
Range | 29.8% | 32.9% |
Mean | 8.1% | 8.4% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.71%), Comanche (6.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |