Lithuanian vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Chippewa
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,141,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 37.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.7% | 34.1% |
| Range | 13.1% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 8.4% |
| Median | 3.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |